As a Mac OS user I use ZFS for Mac OS X which is available from Mac OS Forge. I make this statement because Oliver from Hoerold.de was asking the question here.
As a Mac OS user I use ZFS for Mac OS X which is available from Mac OS Forge. I make this statement because Oliver from Hoerold.de was asking the question here.
Last year I started my base endurance training. I will now post from time to time my effort to train my base endurance. My first ride this year was 66.75km, I made it with an average heartrate of 118bpm. Nach Lohmar Share your bike routes @ Bikely.com <p> It was a little cold at about 0 degrees Celsius, therefore I had not used my common drinking flask. </p> <div align="center"> <div style="width: 510px" class="wp-caption center"> <a href="http://flickr.
If you don’t use the iPhone very much, the battery will last for more than 3 days with one load 🙂
I’ve managed to optimize the performance of my Hac4/GPS data merging script. Optimized Version 2,33s user 0,06s system 89% cpu 2,677 total Old merge and libxml-ruby 13,06s user 0,15s system 91% cpu 14,382 total Old merge and rexml 26,86s user 0,21s system 96% cpu 27,987 total And this is the track which I used for the tests. The track has 1554 trackpoints. I took this route on Saturday. Bensberg – Hommerich – Bensberg
This is the tour on which the photo was taken: Bergisches Land Share your bike routes @ Bikely.com
This should be a comment to a previous post, but it seems that code is not well formatted in comments 🙁 This code snippet below should lead me into the right direction for better performance in merging my cycling log data def new_merge(gpx, hac, delta) # # adjust the 2 arrays # (works only if gpx starts earlier) # while gpx.first[:time] asc.first[:time] gpx.
If have already a script running which is merging the data of those two devices. But after using libxml I got aware of the awful performance of the merging algorithm. d = Array.new asc.each do |c| gpx.each do |e| f = (c[:time] + @delta.to_i) - e[:time] if f = -2 d << {:gpx => e, :asc => c} end end end I created the image which will probably help me in developing a faster algorithm.
Sometime back in May I wrote some utilities to manage the GPX files from my Royaltek RGM 3800. I’ve used rexml to parse the XML file. Now after I’ve read about libxml for ruby I’ve had tried this little gem and I have registered that parsing the GPX file is significantly faster. This was the old code from May with rexml: def parse_gpx(file) require 'rexml/document' include REXML a = Array.